The Neptunes #1 fan site, all about Pharrell Williams and Chad Hugo

theneptunes.org, all about Pharrell Williams and Chad Hugo

Robin Thicke Sues To Protect ‘Blurred Lines’ From Marvin Gaye’s Family

| 0 comments

Robin Thicke – Blurred Lines feat. Pharrell & T.I.

Thicke, Pharrell Williams and Clifford Harris, Jr. claim they were threatened by both Gaye’s family and Funkadelic’s rights-owner, each asserting that the summer hit wasn’t original. In order to shield “Blurred Lines,” the hottest hit of the summer, Robin Thicke, Pharrell Williams and Clifford Harris, Jr. are going to court. A lawsuit was filed in California federal court by the trio against Marvin Gaye’s family and Bridgeport Music, which owns some of Funkadelic’s compositions. At issue are complaints about similarities between “Blurred Lines” and at least two songs.

According to the suit, a copy of which was obtained by The Hollywood Reporter, “Plaintiffs, who have the utmost respect for and admiration of Marvin Gaye, Funkadelic and their musical legacies, reluctantly file this action in the face of multiple adverse claims from alleged successors in interest to those artists. Defendants continue to insist that plaintiffs’ massively successful composition, ‘Blurred Lines,’ copies ‘their’ compositions.”

Marvin Gaye – Got To Give It Up (1977)

The suit claims the Gaye family is alleging that “Blurred Lines” and Gaye’sGot To Give It Up” “feel” or “sound” the same, and that the “Gaye defendants are claiming ownership of an entire genre, as opposed to a specific work.” As for Funkadelic, there’s said to be claimed similarity between Thicke’s hit and Funakedlic’s “Sexy Ways.” “But there are no similarities between plaintiffs’ composition and those the claimants allege they own, other than commonplace musical elements,” states the lawsuit. “Plaintiffs created a hit and did it without copying anyone else’s composition.”

A New York Times critic has noted that “Blurred Lines” is “influenced heavily” by Gaye’sGot To Give It Up,” but the lawsuit makes the point that “being reminiscent of a ‘sound’ is not copyright infringement. The intent in producing ‘Blurred Lines‘ was to evoke an era.” The Gayes and Bridgeport are said to be threatening litigation should the plaintiffs not pay a monetary settlement. Rather than wait for such a lawsuit to proceed, the plaintiffs are going to court to determine the parties’ respective rights and obligations.

In seeking a judgment, Thicke, Williams and Harris Jr. are not only looking for a declaration that their song doesn’t violate the defendants’ rights by copying their songs, but also that the “Gayes do not have an interest in the copyright to the composition ‘Got To Give It Up‘ sufficient to confer standing on them to pursue claims of infringement of that composition.” The plaintiffs are represented by Howard King and Stephen Rothschild of King, Holmes, Paterno & Berliner.

*hollywoodreporter.com

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *.